Informational services have been the center of much discussion and even controversy lately. The Federal Trade Commission’s recent stance on paid to read online services has left the nation’s information technology sector scrambling to create a reaction. This doesn’t mean that all is lost; however, it does mean that an argument that started with simple disagreement has now escalated into a full-blown class-warfare situation.
The dispute starts with an article written by New York Times business writer Amyardo Cuevas. In his piece, Cuevas criticized the failure of informational services such as Wikipedia and Google Places to remove spam from their pages. The dispute then moved to informational services’ inability to remove objectionable content from their sites. The two sides traded barbed comments until a certain number of articles began to leak out onto the Internet. These articles painted a confusing picture of what a company such as Wikipedia actually does, and what an online encyclopedia can do.
- It seems as if Cuevas and the New York Times were correct on their basic argument that these types of sites only provide a point of view rather than a comprehensive collection of information.
- They also implied that the companies who post this type of material have some ulterior motives.
- There are many people who disagree, and have accused the New York Times of trying to make money at the expense of their customers.
- These are the types of accusations that have been directed at Wikipedia and other online content sources in the past. As with anything, it is hard to say if there really is a problem, and if these organizations are truly necessary.
The solution to this problem lies in the form of informational services. These organizations make sure that the websites they post contain only accurate, useful content. Such information is valuable to both the reader and the website owner. Therefore, such a site would offer articles of information that are both helpful and accurate. Additionally, such articles would be written by people who are both knowledgeable and experienced in the area of the topics they cover.
Many people worry that if informational services were to increase in number, newspapers and magazines would no longer be available to the public. This would effectively result in less quality content for the public to read. In order to compensate for this, many companies would simply begin posting advertisements on their websites. With such high-quality content available at an affordable price, such companies would not need to resort to such tactics.
These informational services can be helpful for anyone who needs information on virtually any topic. Whether it is a general piece of information or a complex scientific study, such a resource will help to alleviate the search engine clutter. By providing worthwhile, helpful information, they help to retain interest. As such, the readers would again return to these sites to seek more information.
There are many benefits to these types of informational services. They allow the audience to get the gist of an article without having to actually read it. They also give the reader something to look forward to each day. Since most people have busy lives and limited reading time, such resources are ideal. For people with a short attention span, they ensure they get all the important content they require.
If you are interested in providing informative services of some sort, there are numerous opportunities available. Many individuals would rather not take the time to write their own articles but would rather turn to professional writers for the task. Such professionals are able to provide quality content and would not require the same amount of work as regular writers would. Either way, the audience would benefit immensely from such a resource.